What we do
Pick a service, find your industry, or start from what you are trying to get done.
Explore What we doBrowse What we do
View allProfit360™
Our way of turning your finance function into a source of profit.
Explore Profit360™Browse Profit360™
View allGlobal
A coordinated approach to cross-border finance, tax and assurance questions.
Explore GlobalBrowse Global
View allInsights
Tax changes, finance thinking and what they mean for your business.
Explore InsightsBrowse Insights
View allAbout
Who we are, who you will work with, and how we hold ourselves to account.
Explore AboutBrowse About
View allCareers
Build a career in US accounting, tax and advisory.
Explore CareersBrowse Careers
View allServices
Specialist work across compliance, assurance, finance and growth.
Explore ServicesBrowse Services
View allAudit & Attestation
SOC 2 for Startups
A customer-trust path for startups whose next enterprise buyer, investor, or security review asked for SOC 2, sized to the controls the team can actually evidence.
The value
Why do startups get asked for a SOC 2 report?
Help a startup explain its service, choose a proportionate SOC 2 scope, and build an evidence habit a customer can follow—before anyone promises a report.
Typical scope
What belongs in a startup SOC 2 scope?
The final engagement is tailored to your facts. These are the core workstreams we use to define a useful, responsible scope.
01
Customer and procurement request review
02
Service and system boundary for a startup stack
03
Security, which every SOC 2 includes
04
Gap and evidence readiness
05
Coordination with the people who already run access, change, and vendors
06
An examination only if it can be accepted responsibly
How the engagement moves
How should a startup approach SOC 2?
- 1→
Start from the customer
The useful question is which buyer, partner, or investor asked, what they asked for, and what decision is waiting. Not every startup needs a report.
- 2→
Describe the service honestly
We map the product, hosting, key vendors, and the teams who change the system. The description has to match how the service actually runs.
- 3→
Pick a scope you can evidence
A smaller boundary with real owners is more useful than a broad one nobody can support. Security, which every SOC 2 includes, stays in scope. Other criteria are added only when your organization needs them.
- 4
Plan the report when the facts support it
The next step may be readiness rather than an examination. Type 2, when it is the right report, needs a period of operation. That date is planned, not implied.
Compare
How do SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 differ?
Type 1 can answer a design question at a point in time. Many enterprise buyers later want Type 2 because it covers how controls operated over a period. Type 1 is not a shortcut around evidence, and it is not automatically the right report.
| What differs | Type 1 | Type 2 |
|---|---|---|
| What the report addresses | Whether the controls are suitably designed at a specified point in time. | Design, and whether those controls operated effectively over a specified period. |
| What has to exist first | A system description and controls whose design can be examined at that date. | A period of operation. There is no single timeline. Type 2 periods are commonly three to twelve months; the period is set in planning. |
| What else affects timing | Timing is set in planning. It also depends on readiness, evidence quality, and the availability of control owners. | A Type 2 report needs that period of operation, plus the same readiness, evidence, and control-owner constraints. |
| Which criteria are included | Security is always in scope. Availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy are added only when they are relevant to the service and to the users of the report. | The same. Type 2 does not add criteria. It adds testing of operating effectiveness over the period. |
| What a startup buyer often needs | A design answer at a point in time, when that is the decision the buyer is making. It is not a shortcut around evidence. | Operating effectiveness over a period. Many enterprise buyers later ask for this. The date is planned, not implied. |
| Who signs the report | AT&F signs its own SOC report on design at a point in time, when an examination is accepted and completed. Readiness does not itself produce the report. | AT&F signs its own SOC report on design and operating effectiveness over the period, when an examination is accepted and completed. Readiness does not itself produce the report. |
What to have ready
What should a startup bring to the first SOC 2 call?
What you can expect
What does a startup receive from SOC 2 readiness?
Common questions
Common questions from startups about SOC 2
The quickest way to get a firm answer is to share the facts that make your situation different.
Do startups need a SOC 2 report?+
Not every startup does. The usual trigger is a customer, partner, or investor who will not move forward without one, or a security review that keeps stalling on the same questions. The first conversation should confirm who needs the report and what decision they are making.
Should a startup start with Type 1 or Type 2?+
Type 1 can answer a design question at a point in time. Many enterprise buyers later want Type 2 because it covers how controls operated over a period. Type 1 is not a shortcut around evidence, and it is not automatically the right report. The buyer’s request and the state of the controls decide it.
We do not have a security team. Can we still talk?+
Yes. Early conversations often start with a founder and the people who already administer the product. Readiness is how missing owners, records, and policies become visible. Management still decides what to implement. A missing policy is a fact to plan around.
Will a SOC 2 report replace security questionnaires?+
Usually not entirely. Customers may still send questionnaires. A clear system description, and a completed report when one is appropriate, gives them a better source than a folder of screenshots. It does not require a customer to accept the report in place of their own review.
Is this a promise that we will pass?+
No. A SOC 2 report describes the system and the results of the examination against the selected criteria. Exceptions, when they exist, belong in an honest report. Accepting an engagement is a separate decision, and this page does not make it.
Related assurance
Which page matches a startup SOC 2 request?
SOC 1, SOC 2, a startup buyer request, and ISO certification readiness are related. They are not the same engagement.
SOC 2 audit
The report types, criteria, and evidence a SOC 2 examination actually involves.
Read the pageSOC 1 and SOC 2
How to tell a financial-reporting SOC 1 request from a trust-services SOC 2 request.
Read the pageISO readiness
What changes if the customer asked for an ISO certificate instead of a SOC 2 report.
Read the pageUS tax for international founders
Form 5472, FBAR, NRI returns, India and FEMA, and startup tax on one page.
Read the pageUseful reading
What should a startup read before choosing SOC 2?
Practical perspectives that may help frame the next question. They are general information, not advice based on your particular records, facts or current rules.
Audit & assurance
SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2: start with the decision your customer needs to make
A practical way to frame the report conversation around intended users, system boundaries, evidence and timing—before selecting labels or dates.
Read articleAudit & assurance
SOC 2 readiness: build an evidence plan before you need it
A practical, non-technical way to organise ownership, controls and evidence before a SOC 2 examination begins.
Read articleBusiness advisory
After a funding round: finance priorities for the first 90 days
A practical framework for founders who want their new capital, operating plan, reporting and cash decisions to stay connected after the announcement.
Read articleStart with a conversation
What is the next step when a customer asks for SOC 2?
This is general information for startup teams. It does not promise that an examination will be accepted, a report date, or a particular outcome. Customer requirements differ. Confirm what the buyer asked for before any scope is agreed.